The healthcare sector is massive and entails hundreds of purchases that move countless dollars daily. According to the National Healthcare Anti-Fraud Organization, an approximated $100 billion is lost to Medicare fraud every single year in the united state, with ill-used law enforcement agencies relying greatly on whistleblowers to bring Medicare and Medicaid waste, fraud, and misuse to their focus.

This is why the federal government depends so heavily on whistleblowers to reveal proof of devoting Medicare fraud, and that is why, under the qui tam provisions, the government regulation protects whistleblowers from retaliation and offers such a financially rewarding monetary reward to blow the whistle on thought fraud within the healthcare system.

The anti-retaliation stipulation of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), is commonly regarded as more protective of whistleblowers than other laws that offer an avenue for private citizens to report proof of committing Medicare whistleblower rewards Oberheiden scams or misconduct to law enforcement and submit a qui tam lawsuit.

Because it is so near for employers to retaliate versus healthcare employees who blow the whistle on misconduct occurring within the firm, whistleblower laws prohibit office revenge and provide the sufferers of it lawful recourse if it takes place anyway.

Even a whistleblower honor that is closer to 15 percent of the proceeds of the case can be substantial, specifically if the instance is submitted under the False Claims Act. However, a few of these laws, like the False Claims Act, provide for higher damages and even more payment than your typical wrongful discontinuation case in an attempt to deter whistleblower retaliation.